Ahh, the great and wonderful American classic, the indoor mall. It provides a setting for younger coeds to hang out unchaperoned for the first time and an oasis for those living in the suburban sprawl. Unfortunately for those who enjoyed these massive structures, the market has smartened up and evolved.
The Charlestowne Mall is located in St. Charles, Il, includes about 30 acres of land and is a hair under 400,000 square feet. The property was built in 1991 and became an undeniable loser by the early 2000's. It was once a humming environment of retail commerce and a weekend hot spot. This mall was one of two of its kind in the immediate area. It put a smaller, less accessible location out of business. The St. Charles Mall was built in 1979 and closed in 1995. No competition for Charlestowne in these early days and everything was hunky-dory.Today it is a large building that produces heat in the winter and air conditioning in the summer. It has three anchor tenants that got stuck in long leases; Kohl's, Carson's and Von Maur. There is an eighteen screen movie theater that is actually quite nice. Food; there is one gentleman who sells funnel cakes at the bottom of the non-running escalator. I assume he takes his act on the road in Summer. Think Carnivals.
Why did this happen?
1. Competition
2. A better product for the market
In September 2002, a developer saw weakness in the Charlestowne mall and delivered a swift punch that almost knocked it over. He built a leaner version of the senior mall that didn't require heating and cooling hundreds of thousands of square feet, didn't require security guards and didn't require as many employees to maintain it. The location was on a higher traffic road, an artery leading to a major highway, I88.It was named the Geneva Commons and he built an almost identical one 20 miles North in Algonquin. The size was similar to the former mall at 418,000 SF and was conveniently located 5.0 miles away from Charlestowne. The pricing was better, the location was better and everything was brand new. Retailers flocked and the project was a success...for two years.
Enter Simon Property Group. The 10,000 pound gorilla in the mall world with somewhere in the neighborhood of n 240mm leasable SF (600 Charlestownes). In May 2004, they broke ground on the Chicago Premium Outlets (located in Aurora). Their plans slated 438,000 square feet and was located in the most accessible location, on top of an on/off ramp for I88. To the east they have a nearly 200,000 population in Aurora and 9.4 miles away they had the Charlemmons gang. Close enough to scoop up their market. Soon after opening the Outlet mall, the once booming C Towne mall was knocked out old and would not be getting up. In Fall of 2013 the Geneva Commons were slapped with a foreclosure suit. Four months later, the sister property in Algonquin followed.
The Premium Outlets that Simon built were not as spectacular as the Commons but it did not matter. Construction costs were less which trickles down to the tenant. Fast forward through several successful years at the highly occupied outlet mall and it has been announced that they are adding an additional 290k square feet with 50 more stores tacked onto the already 120. There were 113 of these outlet malls in 1988. That number, today, is around 500. It seems the best mall has been built, for now.
Charlestowne Mall has switched hands a couple times and is currently owned by a California based investment company, which acquired it in late 2013. They have grandiose plans which were reflected in a drawing and statement that called for total revitalization of the property and a tentatively approved $20mm tax break from the City. My guess is that it will never happen. There were fences put up and some dirt moved around almost 2 years ago and nothing since has happened. The new ownership may have smartened up and realized that this play is a loser and there is too much competition. Why would any retailer leave the highway and outlet mall to go to St. Charles? They are not going to risk tens of millions of dollars without sound principles. If they do, it will end badly. The only use that works here is gaming (casino), OTB, etc. It is large enough, the closest competition is in Elgin and Aurora. The building has the right bones to be better than both but is lacking a river which is required by the state for a casino (an extremely outdated and funny law). They already got $20 mill from the city, why not ask for a gaming license?
"The depressing Easter Bunny"
My Ascent Through Real Estate
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Saturday, February 21, 2015
The Shooting Star Asset Class
In the early part of 2012, Warren Buffet was quoted saying, "I'd buy a couple hundred thousand homes." This quote was blasted all over several media outlets, as most investment thoughts that Warren Buffet has, is. The part of the interview that was much less highlighted was that he also believed it to be a impractical.
Right around this time several institutional investors (think huge companies, banks) starting buying hundreds and thousands of single family homes by the portfolios that banks and Fannie and Freddie were selling. The pools of these houses were available due to all of that great recession stuff you have heard about. Houses were foreclosed due to banks giving out money to people who could not afford to repay the loans. Almost all major lenders got in trouble for this subprime lending and have had to shell out almost $100 billion since 2008 in restitution to the federal government.
Until this time, the single family rental market was dominated by the local players owning 5-20 houses and producing some profits and tax shelters for themselves. However, with the banks selling them at the steepest of discounts, it would be hard to lose money on these and therefore easy for funds to pour billions into this investment. They are in it to make money, plain and simple. These activities produce some incredible benefits to several other entities including the renters, the local construction teams, realtors, management companies and most importantly, the cities and villages. It puts thousands to work and depending on the politician, jobs are the most important thing in the country.
Foreclosed/Real Estate Owned (REO) homes are usually left in awful condition. Someone is kicked out of their home by the law and that house then sits for months, sometimes years. It looks awful, brings down the neighborhood and usually smells awful. The benefit that this type of investing brings to the local communities is incalculable. They drastically improve properties that are in rough shape, actually pay their taxes and are providing carefully screened residents.Which is why cities should welcome these groups with open arms. Unfortunately, it is the opposite. Small time villages often view these funds and companies as wealthy and decide to tax them until the get their share. The strictest of village codes are enforced, fees are constantly assessed and the paperwork does not end. The properties must bow to every violation that a city cites. Driveway cracked; fix it, dent in wall; patch it; landscaping not pretty; sod it, smells bad? bring out the mold team. If you don't fix them in 30-45 days the fines quickly reach the thousands and you will meet your local gov rep in court.While these properties are held to unreasonable high standards the house right next door that Joe Doe owns is collapsing and has 5 broken down trucks in the driveway but he is in compliance and not subject to any fees.
Remember the billions that the banks had to pay in fine to the fed? That money trickled down to the states and subsequently to the individual counties. The majority of counties reinvested this money into their market and it is a good idea. They purchase a "bad" house and hire a crew to fix it and sell it. Their biggest benefit is that they will provide additional down payment loans at 0% interest and are payable upon reselling the property. The counties do essentially the exact same thing with the goal of "increasing surrounding property values." They will complete maybe 5 homes a year and will receive a great amount of praise for their efforts. Just two weeks ago there was a full page article in a local paper that lauded the county for providing 1 home to a first time homeowner.
This new asset class is here for the short term but may just be a shooting star in the investment world, never to be seen again. The most substantial reason that is makes sense is that the properties were acquired so cheap. In order for that environment to replicate itself we would need a repeat housing crisis.
Right around this time several institutional investors (think huge companies, banks) starting buying hundreds and thousands of single family homes by the portfolios that banks and Fannie and Freddie were selling. The pools of these houses were available due to all of that great recession stuff you have heard about. Houses were foreclosed due to banks giving out money to people who could not afford to repay the loans. Almost all major lenders got in trouble for this subprime lending and have had to shell out almost $100 billion since 2008 in restitution to the federal government.
Until this time, the single family rental market was dominated by the local players owning 5-20 houses and producing some profits and tax shelters for themselves. However, with the banks selling them at the steepest of discounts, it would be hard to lose money on these and therefore easy for funds to pour billions into this investment. They are in it to make money, plain and simple. These activities produce some incredible benefits to several other entities including the renters, the local construction teams, realtors, management companies and most importantly, the cities and villages. It puts thousands to work and depending on the politician, jobs are the most important thing in the country.
Foreclosed/Real Estate Owned (REO) homes are usually left in awful condition. Someone is kicked out of their home by the law and that house then sits for months, sometimes years. It looks awful, brings down the neighborhood and usually smells awful. The benefit that this type of investing brings to the local communities is incalculable. They drastically improve properties that are in rough shape, actually pay their taxes and are providing carefully screened residents.Which is why cities should welcome these groups with open arms. Unfortunately, it is the opposite. Small time villages often view these funds and companies as wealthy and decide to tax them until the get their share. The strictest of village codes are enforced, fees are constantly assessed and the paperwork does not end. The properties must bow to every violation that a city cites. Driveway cracked; fix it, dent in wall; patch it; landscaping not pretty; sod it, smells bad? bring out the mold team. If you don't fix them in 30-45 days the fines quickly reach the thousands and you will meet your local gov rep in court.While these properties are held to unreasonable high standards the house right next door that Joe Doe owns is collapsing and has 5 broken down trucks in the driveway but he is in compliance and not subject to any fees.
Remember the billions that the banks had to pay in fine to the fed? That money trickled down to the states and subsequently to the individual counties. The majority of counties reinvested this money into their market and it is a good idea. They purchase a "bad" house and hire a crew to fix it and sell it. Their biggest benefit is that they will provide additional down payment loans at 0% interest and are payable upon reselling the property. The counties do essentially the exact same thing with the goal of "increasing surrounding property values." They will complete maybe 5 homes a year and will receive a great amount of praise for their efforts. Just two weeks ago there was a full page article in a local paper that lauded the county for providing 1 home to a first time homeowner.
This new asset class is here for the short term but may just be a shooting star in the investment world, never to be seen again. The most substantial reason that is makes sense is that the properties were acquired so cheap. In order for that environment to replicate itself we would need a repeat housing crisis.
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Little Haus, Big Development
You have seen the shows on HGTV and the articles written by revolutionary homeowners boasting about low energy costs, low build cost with their tiny home or "Micro" homes. The phenomenon is gaining more and more traction each day with the subject often ending at "that's cool" "I would love to live in one of those" "I think I could do that."When the conversation is over, however, it rarely leads to the construction of a miniature house.
In a broad sense, there are only two forms of residential customers; renters and buyers. The age old debate between the two is complex but the benefits of purchasing far outweigh renting in my book. This product creates a middle market between the two that is 1 part home ownership and 1 part leasing.
A developer purchases a large lot. The developer builds as many of these cute, little houses on the lot as possible. The monthly housing payment is way below market value for 1 bedroom apartments ($300-$400). The lots are leased to the renters at $150-$300/month. The builder has a fixed income and the potential to profit on the sales of the homes. The rental market is enamored by the product they can purchase at such a low entry price ($15,000 - $30,000) and hundreds of dollars in savings in utility bills. Magic.
Easy enough? The market is there. The rental market has never been stronger and there are several studies proving this. Millennials have been type-casted as the perpetual renters. This concept gives them an simple and inexpensive entrance into home purchasing.
There would be several large hoops to jump through in order to accomplish this but it is possible.
1. Zoning, Villages, City Councils.
The seemingly most difficult subject. Would a village allow a large number of homes on a small lot? Would they require the lots to have separate PIN's? The pitch would boil down to the "tens of thousands of dollars in tax revenue to your city." There are enough struggling villages in Illinois that I believe one would take the bait.
2. Homeowner backlash.
The property is leased. The owner/operator has the discretion of screening occupants and entrance into tiny town. These standards can be created in unison with villages. These house could only be compared to themselves. These are not single family homes. They are single occupant homes. Appraisers would not be using these homes as comparables, therefore no surrounding areas home values would be compromised.
3. Financing.
Initially, many banks would not want to be providing $10,000 purchase loans. There are two solutions to this. The developer (if able) could provide retail loans after securing a large credit line. This could provide another income stream for the potential developer. Headaches, yes, profits, yes.
Work with local, regional banks and create a program specifically designed for financing this asset class. The loan terms would be short, 10 years, which is a much less intimidating option than the 30 year mortgage. A perfect solution for the always moving, changing millennial age group.
This post was inspired by viewing "Safety Towns" in different places around Illinois. It would chase the concept of a perfect town, similar to Celebration, FL, at a fraction of the scale.
I am sure there are holes in this concept. Please point them out.
Would you not like to live in a neighborhood that looked like this???
In a broad sense, there are only two forms of residential customers; renters and buyers. The age old debate between the two is complex but the benefits of purchasing far outweigh renting in my book. This product creates a middle market between the two that is 1 part home ownership and 1 part leasing.
A developer purchases a large lot. The developer builds as many of these cute, little houses on the lot as possible. The monthly housing payment is way below market value for 1 bedroom apartments ($300-$400). The lots are leased to the renters at $150-$300/month. The builder has a fixed income and the potential to profit on the sales of the homes. The rental market is enamored by the product they can purchase at such a low entry price ($15,000 - $30,000) and hundreds of dollars in savings in utility bills. Magic.
Easy enough? The market is there. The rental market has never been stronger and there are several studies proving this. Millennials have been type-casted as the perpetual renters. This concept gives them an simple and inexpensive entrance into home purchasing.
There would be several large hoops to jump through in order to accomplish this but it is possible.
1. Zoning, Villages, City Councils.
The seemingly most difficult subject. Would a village allow a large number of homes on a small lot? Would they require the lots to have separate PIN's? The pitch would boil down to the "tens of thousands of dollars in tax revenue to your city." There are enough struggling villages in Illinois that I believe one would take the bait.
2. Homeowner backlash.
The property is leased. The owner/operator has the discretion of screening occupants and entrance into tiny town. These standards can be created in unison with villages. These house could only be compared to themselves. These are not single family homes. They are single occupant homes. Appraisers would not be using these homes as comparables, therefore no surrounding areas home values would be compromised.
3. Financing.
Initially, many banks would not want to be providing $10,000 purchase loans. There are two solutions to this. The developer (if able) could provide retail loans after securing a large credit line. This could provide another income stream for the potential developer. Headaches, yes, profits, yes.
Work with local, regional banks and create a program specifically designed for financing this asset class. The loan terms would be short, 10 years, which is a much less intimidating option than the 30 year mortgage. A perfect solution for the always moving, changing millennial age group.
This post was inspired by viewing "Safety Towns" in different places around Illinois. It would chase the concept of a perfect town, similar to Celebration, FL, at a fraction of the scale.
I am sure there are holes in this concept. Please point them out.
Would you not like to live in a neighborhood that looked like this???
Saturday, December 13, 2014
The Deal That Wouldn't Die
My first position as a Real Estate Broker was with Summers Commercial Realty out of Geneva, IL. I learned a tremendous amount from a 20+ year commercial vet, Doug Summers.
The building is located in DeKalb, IL, walking distance to Northern Illinois University. The last tenant was a Subway and after their departure it had sat vacant for well over a year. There was quite a bit of work that needed to be completed before a new tenant could occupy the space. The listing was obtained by Summers and was a forty-five minute drive from our Geneva office. I would be tenant representation while Summers was landlord rep. I work for clients. Summers works for building owner. After about six months we started to refer to it as the deal that wouldn't die.
We received two calls in the same week and I had scheduled two consecutive showings for a Thursday evening.
The first call, a partnership, who wanted to open their second location for a Hookah Lounge. They liked the space but the deal turned sour after negotiating pricing. It was a triple net deal and the taxes put them out of the money. Triple net - the tenant is responsible for their rent, taxes, insurance and Common Area Maintenance fees. My favorite form of leasing as the building owner has no hassle of paying monthly bills, has income from rents and builds equity. A very hands off and watch the cash come in approach.
Ten minutes after Hookah Guys saw the space, the next showing arrived on site. A successful man, Luis, who owned an accounting firm in Aurora, Il. Local businesses will come to him to run their books, ask for tax advisory, etc. He knew numbers. After seeing some great models for a niche brand of Mexican ice cream, "La Michoacana" he decided to give his own go at it. La Michoacana is a type of frozen fruit, popsicle bar that was hails from the Mexican state of Michoacán. They are starting to pop up everywhere and have been a hit in several cities.
He had decided that the space fit his need and we were going to move forward. Lease was signed with some provisions. We won several landlord improvements including resurfacing pavement, shuffling some walls around, lighting, painting exterior (bright pink).This is one of the most exciting parts of the deal but to provide as an indicator that a deal will close couldn't be further from the truth.
Obstacle Numero Uno.
The property needed a "grease trap." This is a device used in almost all cooking restaurants to so that excess grease does not go into drains. Think draining bacon grease down your sink x 500. The Subway was not using a grease trap (light cooking) so we were going to need one installed. This is a DeKalb County health issue and they were in the middle of passing a new ordinance - All restaurants must have at least a 1000 gallon grease trap. I almost fell over. Not only would the cost be in the neighborhood of $20,000, the landlord potentially would not approve it as the building was part of a bigger, master plan that would call for the demolition of this building in less than a decade. After getting the runaround several times over from the county I got the correct person on the phone. I explained to the man that a 1000 gallon grease trap for an ice cream shop is asinine and that we need approval for a 50 gallon grease trap. If not, this building would continue to sit for several years and then be demolished. We ended up getting our 50 gallon approval if we used a certain brand. No problem.
The bathroom debacle.
There were a men's and a woman's bathroom. Both conveniently located down a flight of stairs in the basement. The problem was that a bill with the title, "American Disability Act" (ADA) passed in 1990 (my birth year). Now, I have not read this whole bill as I am sure it is very long, similar to every other piece of governmental regulation. But somewhere in these pages it states that public restrooms must be accessible to someone with a wheelchair for example. This is where it got fun. Initially we tried to get it grandfathered in from Subway. Subway got to do it so should we. This was a "very much no." The City building dept. concluded that since Subway had vacated over 1 year ago the building needed to be brought up to present day standards. I tried the demolition line again to no avail. Our options 1) build new bathroom upstairs. That should read option. We had one option. Thought that this was the straw knowing landlord would not waste several thousand dollars building a bathroom only to tear the entire building down not-such-a-long time period.
I don't call it quits yet and have not yet told Luis the news. I call back eight days later to speak with my building inspector.
Gov't Employee: "He is not available"
Me: "When will he be available?"
GE: "I don't know"
Me: "What do you mean you don't know?!?!?"
No one in the county knew. After running around in several circles and a non-stop hour on the phones, I wondered if the Mayor may know what is going on.
From the Mayor: The entire building department was shut down and closed. They had realized that it would be more financially responsible to taxpayers if a 3rd party, private company performed their building duties. This was our chance. They would surely approve us, I thought. They did.
After a week or two of transition, I got the new guys on the phone, explained the situation and drafted an email to have it in writing. I got a verbal response and written email approval!!! I might have jumped and clapped a couple times after this.
We had received these larger issues approval and now needed the City of DeKalb. The first phone call was a quick, "Oh, that building. Did you ever fix that horrific roof leak?" Ouch.
After all of this we believed we were set. We had received all of the proper County and City approvals to open a new ice cream shop. This process took about eight months.
Move in commenced in September 2014. He realized that the sinks are not draining and the plumbing is shot. It required much more than a simple rod. He received an initial estimate. $15,000 for sewer repair, down the drain (cheap pun, I know). It took another 7-8 weeks to get everything situated and ready for a grand opening. They are currently open for business and I am quite happy for Luis and his new venture. The night before Thanksgiving, while attending a "Friendsgiving," I received a couple picture text messages from my friend Luis...
Honorable mention issues that did not get a paragraph: Mold remediation in basement, broken back door, client rupturing his intestine(!!!), client opening a second location mid-deal. 4-week attorney lease review.
The building is located in DeKalb, IL, walking distance to Northern Illinois University. The last tenant was a Subway and after their departure it had sat vacant for well over a year. There was quite a bit of work that needed to be completed before a new tenant could occupy the space. The listing was obtained by Summers and was a forty-five minute drive from our Geneva office. I would be tenant representation while Summers was landlord rep. I work for clients. Summers works for building owner. After about six months we started to refer to it as the deal that wouldn't die.
We received two calls in the same week and I had scheduled two consecutive showings for a Thursday evening.
The first call, a partnership, who wanted to open their second location for a Hookah Lounge. They liked the space but the deal turned sour after negotiating pricing. It was a triple net deal and the taxes put them out of the money. Triple net - the tenant is responsible for their rent, taxes, insurance and Common Area Maintenance fees. My favorite form of leasing as the building owner has no hassle of paying monthly bills, has income from rents and builds equity. A very hands off and watch the cash come in approach.
Ten minutes after Hookah Guys saw the space, the next showing arrived on site. A successful man, Luis, who owned an accounting firm in Aurora, Il. Local businesses will come to him to run their books, ask for tax advisory, etc. He knew numbers. After seeing some great models for a niche brand of Mexican ice cream, "La Michoacana" he decided to give his own go at it. La Michoacana is a type of frozen fruit, popsicle bar that was hails from the Mexican state of Michoacán. They are starting to pop up everywhere and have been a hit in several cities.
He had decided that the space fit his need and we were going to move forward. Lease was signed with some provisions. We won several landlord improvements including resurfacing pavement, shuffling some walls around, lighting, painting exterior (bright pink).This is one of the most exciting parts of the deal but to provide as an indicator that a deal will close couldn't be further from the truth.
Obstacle Numero Uno.
The property needed a "grease trap." This is a device used in almost all cooking restaurants to so that excess grease does not go into drains. Think draining bacon grease down your sink x 500. The Subway was not using a grease trap (light cooking) so we were going to need one installed. This is a DeKalb County health issue and they were in the middle of passing a new ordinance - All restaurants must have at least a 1000 gallon grease trap. I almost fell over. Not only would the cost be in the neighborhood of $20,000, the landlord potentially would not approve it as the building was part of a bigger, master plan that would call for the demolition of this building in less than a decade. After getting the runaround several times over from the county I got the correct person on the phone. I explained to the man that a 1000 gallon grease trap for an ice cream shop is asinine and that we need approval for a 50 gallon grease trap. If not, this building would continue to sit for several years and then be demolished. We ended up getting our 50 gallon approval if we used a certain brand. No problem.
The bathroom debacle.
There were a men's and a woman's bathroom. Both conveniently located down a flight of stairs in the basement. The problem was that a bill with the title, "American Disability Act" (ADA) passed in 1990 (my birth year). Now, I have not read this whole bill as I am sure it is very long, similar to every other piece of governmental regulation. But somewhere in these pages it states that public restrooms must be accessible to someone with a wheelchair for example. This is where it got fun. Initially we tried to get it grandfathered in from Subway. Subway got to do it so should we. This was a "very much no." The City building dept. concluded that since Subway had vacated over 1 year ago the building needed to be brought up to present day standards. I tried the demolition line again to no avail. Our options 1) build new bathroom upstairs. That should read option. We had one option. Thought that this was the straw knowing landlord would not waste several thousand dollars building a bathroom only to tear the entire building down not-such-a-long time period.
I don't call it quits yet and have not yet told Luis the news. I call back eight days later to speak with my building inspector.
Gov't Employee: "He is not available"
Me: "When will he be available?"
GE: "I don't know"
Me: "What do you mean you don't know?!?!?"
No one in the county knew. After running around in several circles and a non-stop hour on the phones, I wondered if the Mayor may know what is going on.
From the Mayor: The entire building department was shut down and closed. They had realized that it would be more financially responsible to taxpayers if a 3rd party, private company performed their building duties. This was our chance. They would surely approve us, I thought. They did.
After a week or two of transition, I got the new guys on the phone, explained the situation and drafted an email to have it in writing. I got a verbal response and written email approval!!! I might have jumped and clapped a couple times after this.
We had received these larger issues approval and now needed the City of DeKalb. The first phone call was a quick, "Oh, that building. Did you ever fix that horrific roof leak?" Ouch.
After all of this we believed we were set. We had received all of the proper County and City approvals to open a new ice cream shop. This process took about eight months.
Move in commenced in September 2014. He realized that the sinks are not draining and the plumbing is shot. It required much more than a simple rod. He received an initial estimate. $15,000 for sewer repair, down the drain (cheap pun, I know). It took another 7-8 weeks to get everything situated and ready for a grand opening. They are currently open for business and I am quite happy for Luis and his new venture. The night before Thanksgiving, while attending a "Friendsgiving," I received a couple picture text messages from my friend Luis...
Honorable mention issues that did not get a paragraph: Mold remediation in basement, broken back door, client rupturing his intestine(!!!), client opening a second location mid-deal. 4-week attorney lease review.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)